963 bài Essays mẫu - Phần 57

do some of the talking during a class. Both of the two means have their own 
advantages. On a personal level, though, I prefer the latter one, since there are far more 
superiorities than the former one. 
From the position of students, as an essential part of the class, students are eager to have 
their good thoughts and comments to be appreciated by the teacher. On the other hind, 
students are easy to get distracted and feel soporific if they only listened to their teacher, 
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at 
www.tailieuduhoc.org 
as if they are stuffed by the teacher instead of absorbing knowledge voluntarily. In that 
way, students will lose their interests in class, which would inevitably induce students` 
descending in study. 
Likewise, from the position of teachers, all of the teachers would prefer an active class 
rather than a stiff one. The reason is so obvious that it is less arduous but more effective 
to teach a class in which students talk at intervals. As a matter of fact, it is a good 
feedback to the teacher by which she or he can be well acknowledged whether the 
students have grasped what she or he has lectured. In that case, the teacher will take some 
actions correspondingly. 
In conclusion, neither students nor teachers like teaching in the way of sole talking by 
teachers other than that of getting students involved in the talking. Stimulating the 
students to participate in the discussion of the class, virtually, is the communication 
between teachers and students which would benefit not only teachers but also students. 
Essay 869 Topic 175 Should students do some of the talking in class? 
I prefer classes where students are able to participate along with the teacher. In my 
opinion, it is very important to let the students do some of the talking because those way 
teachers will be able to determine who listens to the class and who does not. 
I strongly believe that allowing students to talk about a certain subject during the class 
will let the students to understand better, and will improve interaction in the class. It will 
also build a healthy relationship between teachers and students because by discussing a 
certain theme in the class students can always ask questions and make sure that they 
understand a topic correctly and fully. Teachers should also organize conferences and 
open dialogues in order to encourage students to speak up, and possibly to come up with 
some information, related to certain subject, on their own. Such practice will enable each 
student with a feeling of confidence and ability to push harder and go deeper. It will teach 
students to ask for help, treat each other with respect, and it will break barriers between 
students because they will have to work as a team in order to be ready for the next class. 
When the teacher does all the talking it makes it easier for the students not to pay any 
attention in the class. They can talk to each other and never go deeper in to a certain 
theme. The students will stay socially closed to each other. It may also lead to certain 
competitiveness between the students simply because someone understands particular 
subject better than the rest of the class. 
I will always value more a teacher who allows his/her students to discuss themes in the 
class. A teacher who shows more interest in getting to know the students beyond lectures. 
A teacher who wants to know what his/her students think about the class`s subjects, and 
whether the theme is available to everyone. A real teacher should not care only about 
how to end a lecture faster. 
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at 
www.tailieuduhoc.org 
Essay 870 Topic 175 Should students do some of the talking in class? 
Some students like classes where teachers lecture(do all of the talking) in class. Other 
students prefer classes where the students do some of the talking. In my opinion, I will 
prefer the latter instead of the former. My arguments are as follows: 
The main reason is the teacher`s function for students in class. I think the teacher`s 
function in class is teaching and answering student`s question so that the students can 
really master the knowledge. Actually, it is a truth that Every student want to learn more 
new knowledge from teachers in class when they go to school, it is very important for 
students that the teachers have told them in class. But, the students maybe have their 
opinions about the same topic or they want to ask the teachers some questions in class. So 
those classes where the teachers can lecture and the students can do some of the talking in 
class are necessary for every student. In those classes, the teachers can teach something 
what they think they must do to the students, on the other hand, the students can talk 
about something about what the teachers have taught or ask the questions they haven`t 
understood in class. Through those classes, I think the students can learn more and grasp 
them. 
The other reason is the nature rule. As you know, every class is equal or over 45 minutes 
in school. Now, you can image the follows: first, you are a teacher, what will happen 
when you keep on lecturing all the class? then, you are a student, what will happen again 
when you always keep up silence through all the class? The results will be the teachers 
feel thirsty and tired, the students are upset and bored. How about the classes where the 
teacher lecture(do all of the class)? My answer is that I do not like it. 
In a word, I prefer the classes where the students do some talking rather than the classes 
where the teachers lecture, because I think the classes where the students do some talking 
can provide students more knowledge and more interesting. 
Essay 871 Topic 175 Should students do some of the talking in class? 
Maybe since there has been a school or classes there is a discussion about the preferable 
style of teaching. The participants in this discussion argue about the perfect or adequate 
style of teaching, whether the front style is preferable or the interaction between teacher 
and students. Both the front style and the interactive style have their advantages and 
disadvantages. 
The most common style is the one when students listen as the teacher lectures. Some 
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at 
www.tailieuduhoc.org 
people call it the old-fashioned style because even the Romans or Greeks used this style 
of teaching. The one that knows the details about a topic lectures them to the audience 
that in many cases does not have a clue about it. This style is often used in classes with a 
huge number of students. This is the case, for example in a lecture hall in a university. In 
many cases it is appropriate because if anybody who has question poses it, there will not 
be enough time to lecture the foreseen topic. However, it is also and still quite common in 
secondary schools. Here mostly the older part of the teachers uses this style. They learned 
and got used to it while they became a teacher. Even if there might be a change in the 
teaching style they still stick to their old-fashioned one. A common reason is that they 
simply do not like to change their style of teaching during their last few years as a 
teacher. 
This leads us to the other style of teaching, the one when students interact considerably 
with the teacher and with their fellow students. The type of teaching is also called the 
modern way of holding classes. While interacting during class the students get involved 
with the theme more likely than with the old-fashioned style. Therefore the way of 
understanding and remembering learned topics is easier. Of course, it is very difficult to 
practice the interactive style in classes with a high number of students like at big 
universities. But in secondary schools and especially in primary school it is a very 
appropriate way of teaching. Because the students have the possibility to interact with 
their teacher or with other students, they elaborate on the one hand their self-confidence 
and on the other hand they will get the chance to pose a question if they have not 
understood anything in class. As a result their grades improve. 
In conclusion we can say that the modern way of teaching, the interactive style, is the 
preferable one. However, there are and will be classes in which the frontal teaching is the 
more appropriate one. Thus we can summarize that there is no non plus ultra classroom 
style. 
Essay 872 Topic 175 type of lecture in class 
Some students like classes where teachers lecture in class, but other students prefre 
classes where the students do some of the talking. If I were faced with this issue, I would 
probably agree with the latter one. In the following discussion, I would like to reason and 
provide evidence to support my viewpoint. The first and foremost reason that I have 
chosen to put forward is that a class in which the students do some of the talking gives 
the teachers a way to measure the quality of his or her lecture. To illustrate this point, 
there is an example more persuasive: many teachers believe that if the students are not 
responding in class to the lecture, then very probably the lecture has failed to be effective. 
If you can see that, you can understand it more deeply. In the second place, another chief 
reason for my view is that when the students are encoursged to speak in class, they are 
also more attentive to the lecture. For example, realizing that the teacher can ask anybody 
in the class at any point during the lecture, the students will be more alert. Furthermore, 
when the students are encouraged to speak up in class, they are also encouraged to 
display their intelligence. The only way to respond intelligently to a lecture-to ask the