963 bài Essays mẫu - Phần 24

to some extent, can build up nice personalities that 
are essential for my future career. As we all understand, management knowledge itself 
does not lead to success without a combination of broad social network and nice 
personality. Working with colleague helps me to cultivate nice dispositions-cooperative, 
responsible, caring for others, outgoing, etc. 
All in all, working for an employer suits my situation perfectly. Therefore, from what has 
been discussed above, I would rather choose to be an employee and prepare myself in all 
fields, if possible, for my future self-employed. 
Essay 360 Topic 64 Self-employed vs. employed 
My friends and I always talk about our jobs. Whether to work for ourselves, own a 
business or work for an employer is one of the hot topics we discuss. Some prefer to 
work for themselves or own a business. While others prefer to work for an employer. As 
far as I am concerned, I would like to work for myself. My arguments for this point are 
listed as follows. 
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at 
www.tailieuduhoc.org 
First of all, perhaps one disadvantage to work for others is that we could not plan our 
time freely. We have to work from 8 to 5 according to the employer`s schedule. No 
matter what the weather is like and no matter whether it is necessary, we have to go to 
our office on time. We have no choice but to obey the rules set by the employer. Suppose 
we work for ourselves, we could decide our own timetable. We could find the best time 
for us to work and improve the work efficiency. 
Another reason for my inclination for working for ourselves is that we earn what we 
deserve. Our wages would be very clear to us. We know what we should earn. That`s fair 
and we would work harder to get better result. However, when we work for others, the 
boss decides what we earn. It often occurs that we get less than we could earn. 
In addition, working for ourselves, we try our best in our work to reach our goal, thus it 
would be faster to be successful in life. If we work for others, the enthusiasm to work 
may not be so high. I heard many enterprisers who work for themselves succeed earlier 
than people of the same age. 
In a word, in spite of the fact that there may be a couple of disadvantages to work for 
ourselves, I feel that the advantages are more obvious, that is we could plan our time for 
work more freely, earn the amount of money that we deserve and get early success in life. 
Taking into account of all these factors, I would choose to work for myself. 
Essay 361 Topic 64 Self-employed vs. employed 
Some people prefer to work for themselves or own a business. Others prefer to work for 
an employer. Personally, I prefer to work for myself. I choose to be self-employed 
because of the reasons as follows. 
I can decide what I do according my own willing and interest. This point is the most 
important because one person can find work motivation from his interest. I also can 
decide how to do the thing. I can choose my own directions and ways, whereas those who 
are employed by others must do work according to the directions of their employers. 
The other important point is that I have freedom to decide when I do the thing. The time I 
work is determined by myself. I am not constricted by other people. Hence, if I am tired, 
I can rest in the daytime; if I have more energy, I can work late at night. I have more 
freedom on the choice of work time than those who work for an employer. 
I work for myself, so I only can depend on myself. This can train me to learn more 
knowledge and to work hard and teach me to face the success and the failure correctly. I 
can learn how to take advantage of different conditions and deal with different situations 
from the practice. I can learn to encourage myself when I succeed and not to be afraid of 
difficulties and failures. 
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at 
www.tailieuduhoc.org 
Based on the above statements, I think that self-employing has more advantages. So I 
prefer to be self-employed. 
Essay 362 Topic 64 Self-employed vs. employed 
Today, we are living in a rapidly developed society. The science and technology are 
striding forward with a dramatically fast footstep. The styles of employment are also 
increasingly diversified. Some people prefer to work for themselves, while other prefer to 
work for employer. Personally, if I am qualified enough, I would like choosing to work 
for myself. As a matter of fact, to be self-employed have many advantages which can 
never be found when you work for others. 
Firstly, to be self-employed can avoid the embarrassing fate of to be unemployment or to 
become the sad laid-off workers. You are your own boss and you can never suffer the 
painful course of job-hunting. Every one must know the severe and cruel competition in 
the talent market. Even when you have done a good preparation and hold a thick pile of 
resume and various kinds of diplomas or certification to have an interview, your fate still 
remain unknown. The feeling of disappointment and a sense of helpless and failure are 
beyond description by words, let alone the extremely tense stress you suffered during the 
course of job-hunting. So, imaging, if you own a company, you are the boss, every thing 
is yours, then what a wonderful sense of superiority. 
Secondly, to be self-employed means you will face more opportunities to enrich your 
mind, expand your horizon and accumulate knowledge. The difficulties, obstacles and 
some other special experiences you encountered during the course of doing business will 
enable you become more mature and more composed. The heat competition in the 
business community will let you taste all flavor of our colorful life. 
All in all, according to above analysis, we can safely draw a conclusion that to be self-
employed is really a gold opportunity for you to achieve an all-round personality. 
Though, we have to admit that to work for other can enjoy more freedom and suffer less 
stress than to be self-employed, but why we do not find a chance to challenge ourselves 
and to lead a different kind of life. 
Essay 363 Topic 65 Should a city perserve its historic buildings or replace them with 
modern ones? 
Every culture has its special features. Buildings, as symbol of architectural heritage, are 
an important part of the history of any country or city. Moreover, they could help us find 
the answers of many questions about the historical development of our society. 
Therefore, I truly believe that every city-administration should try to preserve the old, 
historic buildings. 
All over the world many buildings are preserved in their authentic appearances. 
Furthermore, many of them have unique constructions and are really beautiful and 
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at 
www.tailieuduhoc.org 
impressive. In my opinion, the destruction of such remarkable pieces of architecture and 
their replacement with modern buildings can be called ‘barbarity`. Nevertheless, a lot of 
old buildings belonging to the historical heritage of the world are protected by UNESCO. 
It is a fact that cities, which have their old, historic buildings, are favorite places for 
holiday and tourism. The reason is that these cities keep their special atmosphere and 
could offer us a magnificent journey through their cultural and architectural history. 
The only reasonable argument to destroy some historic buildings and replace them with 
modern ones, is when there is a risk of self-destruction, which could endanger human 
lives. 
In conclusion I would say that preserving old, historic buildings could be considered as a 
sign of our respect and regard to the previous generations. I am aware that it is an 
expensive initiative. But who can evaluate the worth the historic buildings have, for those 
who will come after us. And I would dare to ask ` who gives us the right to destroy what 
the centuries have kept for us? And I would answer `Nobody`! 
Essay 364 Topic 65 Should a city perserve its historic buildings or replace them with 
modern ones? 
A city could not destroy the historic buildings, the city should preserve its old, historic 
buildings. The historic buildings for a city even for a country have a unlimited value. 
When people destroy the buildings, they will not show up again and the historic buildings 
are record a period of history. 
First, the historic buildings for a city even for a country have a unlimited value. Those 
buildings show up in a specific time. The time is the only thing could not go backwards. 
Therefore, if people destroy the buildings, they will never see it and have it again. For 
example, ShangHai, one of the biggest cities in China, destroyed some historic buildings 
in 1950`s. Those buildings built in end of 19th and the beginning of 20th. Most of those 
building are building by the foreigners and with the foreigner styles. Not only on building 
like that but the whole street or the neighborhood. In 1950`s, people were crazy, they 
destroyed the building, but in some reason, they did not destroy all of them and replace 
them with then modern buildings. However, right now, the people in Shanghai are 
repented. But all the buildings are gone. 
Besides that, those buildings record a period of history. I still use Shanghai as an 
example. The people destroy the building in 1950`s because those building built in 
colonial time in China. It records a very dark history in Chinese history. However, in 
1950`s the new regime just built up. People do not want to recall those histories by those 
building, so they destroyed them. However, yes, the buildings record a period of history 
because these styles and the stuffs. But the history could not be destroyed even destroyed 
the building.