Students and teachers' perceptions of speaking assessment at upper-High schools in vietnam
It is a fact that the new English textbooks written by Pro. Hoang Van Van and co-authors have
made the context of English language teaching (ELT) in Vietnam an enormous shift from teachercentered to learner-centered which focuses on communication. The introduction of the books,
however, has posed many teachers of English at upper-high schools challenges, especially
speaking teaching and assessment. From those backdrops, it is necessary to conduct studies to
explore teachers and students perceptions of the issue aiming at providing a theoretical framework
for assessing speaking. The purpose of this study is to investigate the task types of speaking and
criteria for speaking assessment that teachers at upper-high schools used to assess speaking.
he questionnaire was carried out first, and then the interviews were carried out at each school, first the teacher interview followed by the student interviews. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Results from questionnaires for students How often do you have speaking test? There are 70 answers as hardly ever, that takes up about 55% of the total. 36 answers as sometimes that accounts for 28.5% of the total. 20 answers as once or twice a term that accounts for 15.8 % of the total. Data obtained from the first question shows that most of the students hardly ever have speaking test during the school terms. What types of task you are required to do? There are 80 answers as questions and answers, which accounts for 63.5% of the total. 20 answers for read aloud task which takes up 15.8% of the total. 10 students said that they played in roles which accounts for 7.9% of the total. Few answers for the other options. The data reveals that teachers used questions and answers mostly when they conduct speaking task types. Do you know how you are assessed? 126 responses are negative. That means students do not know on what criteria they are assessed during the speaking test. That also means that they do not know what to focus on while doing the speaking test. Do you like speaking test? 92 students said they do not like the speaking test, which is 73% of the total. 12 answers are positive. That means only 9.5% of the students said that they like speaking test. 24 answers are negative which accounts for 17.4%. The data shows that most of the students do not like the speaking test. Do you think that speaking ability is more important than other language skills? The answers are surprising that 112 students said that other skills are more important which takes up 89% of the total. Only 3 students said that speaking is more important that accounts for only 2.3%. 15 students did not have an idea about the importance of speaking. Results from questionnaires for teachers Have you had any trainings about assessment? 12 out of 15 teachers said that they have very limited knowledge about language assessment, which takes up 80% of the total. Only one teacher said that she had learned about assessment at university but did not remember much about it. Two of the teachers said that they studied English in an in-service program so they did not learn about language assessment. The data show that teachers at upper-high schools have very limited knowledge about language assessment in general and speaking assessment in particular. What are the types of task do you use to assess speaking? Nguyễn Thị Diệu Hà Tạp chí KHOA HỌC & CÔNG NGHỆ 191(15): 245 - 250 249 10 teachers said that they just used questions and answers as the popular task type (67%). Three teachers said that they used role-play tasks (20%). Two teachers said that they used other types of task. The data shows that teachers used just few task types. Most of the tasks are responsive type. What criteria do you use to assess speaking ability? 8 out of teacher said that the speaking assessment criteria are on grammar and vocabulary (53%). Four teachers said that they used both macro and micro criteria when marking students. Three teachers said that they give marks holistically that means they combined varieties of criteria of assessment. The data reveals a fact that teachers take serious attentions on grammar when assessing non-grammar aspects of language. Do you know about these types of speaking assessment? Only two teachers know a little bit about criterion assessment because they had just took an exam on CEFR. Most of the interviewers have no ideas of the listed speaking assessment. Results from interviews Three teachers of English at different schools are selected for the semi-structured interview. They are selected because they have just passed the C1 level exam and they seemed to have better understanding of speaking task types and assessing speaking criteria. The researcher asked the first teacher some questions about problems she encountered when conducting speaking assessment. She confessed that she does not do many speaking activities as well as speaking test while teaching. The reason for that is that the students are not interested in speaking. They just want to do the written test to strengthen grammar and reading ability. The other reason is that the large class size prevents her from doing speaking activities. She wants to teach a smaller class so that she can help students develop oral skills. The second teacher said that he ignores most of the speaking activities in class because he did not have enough time to do the task. Besides, he has limited understanding about language assessment. He would like to attend a course specified on language testing and assessment. The third teacher said that she is aware of the importance of speaking skill and she really want to help students to talk in the class but the constrains of the curriculum prevents her from doing time-consuming speaking activities. She said that she expect some changes in the way of graduation exam so that the focus of teaching will be on oral skills. CONCLUSION By conducting a research to investigate speaking practice at three upper-high schools in Thai Nguyen province with 126 students and 15 teachers of English, the conclusion is that: Teachers do not spend much time and energy on the speaking skill. In other words, the focus of teaching is not on oral communication just because of the exam- based curriculum. Teachers do not have sufficient understanding of speaking and assessment as well as speaking task types. Implication The influence of the exam-based curriculum has had bad washback on both teaching and learning of oral skills at upper-high schools. This is the cause of unbalanced attention has been paid to teaching and learning of speaking and listening which are the main attentions of communicative teaching. In coming years, there should be alternative forms of assessment for those who expect to develop their oral skill. One of the possible solutions is that we can have oral exams through out the school year. Those who gain good achievement in those exams will not be required to take the final exam for graduation, or they may still sit for the exam if they want some plus marks for the other subjects. There should be changes in the way language is test in the final exam so that the focus of teaching shift from exam-based to competence based to develop full language ability. Nguyễn Thị Diệu Hà Tạp chí KHOA HỌC & CÔNG NGHỆ 191(15): 245 - 250 250 REFERENCES 1. Rivers, Wilga. M. (1987). Interactive Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge Language Teaching Library. 2. Nation, I. P. (2011). Second language speaking. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 444- 454). New York, NY: Routledge. 3. Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: a focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25: 385-402. 4. Brown. H. Douglas. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY. Pearson Education. 5. Scott, Thornbury. (2005). How to teach speaking. Pearson Education 6. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe, Modern Languages Division, Strasbourg/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7. Bachman, L.F. & Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 8. Louma, S. (2003). Assessing Speaking (Cambridge Language Assessment). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 9. Fulcher, G. & Davidson, F. (2007). Language Testing and Assessment an advanced resource book. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York. 10. Brown. H. Douglas. (2001). Teaching by Principle: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman. 11. Simensen, A.M. (1998). Teaching a Foreign Language Principles and Procedures. 2 nd edition Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke AS, Bergen 12. N.H.H. Thuy & T.T.T. Nga. (2017). An investigation into EFL teachers' perceptions of in- class speaking assessment. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, (Vol.34), No.2, 125-139. 13. Phan. N.H.N. (2014). Challenges/constraints in teaching today's English in Vietnam: Teachers' voice. Conference proceeding. TÓM TẮT NHẬN THỨC CỦA GIÁO VIÊN VÀ HỌC SINH TRONG VIỆC ĐÁNH GIÁ KỸ NĂNG NÓI TẠI CÁC TRƯỜNG THPT Ở VIỆT NAM Nguyễn Thị Diệu Hà* Khoa Ngoại ngữ - ĐH Thái Nguyên Thực tế cho thấy bộ sách giáo khoa tiếng Anh mới được biên soạn bởi GS. Hoàng Văn Vân và các cộng sự đã tạo ra một sự chuyển biến lớn trong bối cảnh giảng dạy tiếng Anh ở Việt Nam từ định hướng lấy người dạy làm trung tâm sang lấy người học làm trung tâm, tập trung vào khả năng giao tiếp. Tuy nhiên, việc sử dụng bộ sách đã đặt ra nhiều thách thức cho giáo viên dạy tiếng Anh tại các trường trung học phổ thông, đặc biệt là việc dạy và đánh giá kỹ năng Nói. Từ bối cảnh trên, chúng tôi nhận thấy cần có những nghiên cứu nghiêm túc để tìm hiểu cảm nhận của giáo viên và học sinh về vấn đề đó nhằm tạo ra một khung lý thuyết cho viêc đánh giá kỹ năng Nói. Mục tiêu của nghiên cứu này là điều tra các loại loại hình bài tập mà giáo viên sử dụng cũng như các tiêu chí để đánh giá kỹ năng Nói. Từ khóa: nhận thức; đánh giá kỹ năng Nói; đánh giá ngôn ngữ; học ngôn ngữ; tiêu chí đánh giá Ngày nhận bài: 12/12/2018; Ngày hoàn thiện: 26/12/2018; Ngày duyệt đăng: 28/12/2018 * Tel: 0947 998798, Email: dieuha.sfl@tnu.edu.vn
File đính kèm:
- 97_124_1_pb_2533_2124498.pdf