Luyện kỹ năng viết Tiếng Anh 155 chủ đề viết luận Tiếng Anh (Có bài mẫu cho mỗi chủ đề) - Topic 94

LUYỆN KỸ NĂNG VIẾT TIẾNG ANH 
155 CHỦ ĐỀ VIẾT LUẬN TIẾNG ANH 
( CÓ BÀI MẪU CHO MỖI CHỦ ĐỀ) 
TOPIC 94 
Some people trust their first impressions about a person’s character 
because they believe these judgments are generally correct. Other 
people do not judge a person’s character quickly because they believe 
first impressions are often wrong. Compare these two attitudes. Which 
attitude do you agree with? Support your choice with specific examples. 
Any opinion is, in fact, a judgment. I feel that as Americans we would do 
well to judge others less often. Still, we must be able to decide whom to 
spend our time with and whom we’d rather forget. In my opinion, this type 
of judgment is best after we get to know other people. First impressions are 
not always accurate impression. 
Judging a person based on a first impression does save time. There are 
more people than anyone could possibly get to know in one lifetime. It is 
frustrating to waste time getting to know someone, only to find out that your 
first impression was correct and that you really don’t like him or her. So is it 
a waste of time getting to know people your probably won’t like? That 
seems to be a valid point of view, but I believe that it is not the best attitude 
to take. 
It’s more humane to spend time getting to know people before judging 
them. I know that I don’t always make a good first impression even when I 
truly like the person with whom I am interacting. We all have bad days, I 
wouldn’t want to lose a job or a potential friendship simply because I picked 
out the wrong clothing or said something wrong. I think everyone deserves 
the chances make a second impression. 
If we all base our final opinion of others on first impression, it would be 
hard to get to know anyone. There is always more to people than meets the 
eye. If we don’t give someone a chance, we may be missing out on meeting 
a life-long friend. That would truly be shame. 
TOPIC 95 
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People are 
never satisfied with what they have; they always want something more 
or something different. Use specific reasons to support your answer. 
I think it’s probably true that people are never satisfied with what they 
have. They always want something more or something different from what is 
theirs. This just seems to be part of our human nature. Look at a toddler, 
Give her a toy to play with and she’ happy—until she sees something else. 
Then she wants that other toy to play with. If she and her brother are each 
given a cookie, she’ll look to see whose cookie is bigger. She’ll protest 
loudly if she thinks her brother is getting more. 
“The grass is always greener” is an old expression, but it’s a good 
expression of how many of us feel. We’re always striving for a better job, a 
nicer place to live, a fancier car, or more expensive clothes. Part of this 
reaching for more and better is because we care about what other people 
think and want to impress them. Part of it is trying to make ourselves feel 
successful. But there’ also something in our nature that tells us we can do 
better and reach higher. 
This isn’t always a negative quality. There’s another saying: ”A man’s 
reach should excess his grasp. Or what’s a heaven for?” It’s a good thing to 
be constantly pushing ourselves and looking for something different. If we 
don’t try for more and different things, we begin to stagnate, like a pool that 
doesn’t get any fresh water. 
The problem comes when we won’t let ourselves be satisfied with 
anything we have. If we have a comfortable life and still feel as if something 
‘s missing, then we need to look inward. The something that’s missing may 
be in our spirit. 
TOPIC 95 
 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should 
read those books that are about real events, real people, and established 
facts. Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion. 
The Important of Fiction 
How could anyone suggest that people should only read about real events, 
real people, and established facts? For one thing, that means people wouldn’t 
be reading half of all the great books that have ever been written, not to 
mention the plays, short stories and poetry. For another, it would mean that 
people’s imaginations would not develop as children and would remain 
dulled throughout their lives. 
Reading stories as a child helps develop our creativity by reaching us a lot 
about how to use words to create mental images. It open our world up, 
exposing us to other times and different ways of living. Reading histories of 
those times would serve kind of the same purpose, but it probably wouldn’t 
stick in our minds as sharply. Reading an essay about poverty in Victorian 
England is not the same thing as reading in Charles Dicken’s Oliver Twist. 
The images of a small boy being sold are more horrifying than simply 
reading the statement, “children were sold into labor “because a novel makes 
that small boy seem real to understanding fiction makes a more lasting 
impression on our minds and emotions. 
Besides, storytelling is an emotional need for human beings. From earliest 
times, humans have taught their children about life, not by telling them facts 
and figures, but by telling them stories. Some of these stories show what 
people are like (human nature),and help us experience a wide range of 
feelings. Some make us think about how we should act. Telling a child that 
it’s wrong to lie will make little impression, but telling him the story of a 
little boy whose grows longer every time be tell a lie will make a big 
impression. 
Fiction is too important to our culture, our minds, and our emotions. How 
could we ever give it up?