Luyện kỹ năng viết Tiếng Anh 155 chủ đề viết luận Tiếng Anh (Có bài mẫu cho mỗi chủ đề) - Topic 127

LUYỆN KỸ NĂNG VIẾT TIẾNG ANH 
155 CHỦ ĐỀ VIẾT LUẬN TIẾNG ANH 
( CÓ BÀI MẪU CHO MỖI CHỦ ĐỀ) 
TOPIC 127 
You have the opportunity to visit a foreign country for two weeks. 
Which country would you like to visit? Use specific reasons and details 
to explain your choice. 
 If I could visit any foreign country, I’d like to visit Ireland. The scenery 
there is so beautiful . Ireland has a lot of rain and that makes everything very 
green and lush . It hasn’t become a completely industrialized country yet, so 
there are still areas where the countryside is unspoiled by pollution. Often 
,you can drive for miles without seeing another car or coming to a big city. 
I’d like to take my set of paints and several canvases and try to capture some 
of the scenes there. It seems every way you turn, you’re looking at beautiful 
scenery. The area near the ocean is especially dramatic, with giant dark cliffs 
rising out of the water. 
 I also think I’d enjoy the slower pace of Ireland. It’s so different from 
the busy pace of my country . Of course, Ireland’s big cities are just as hectic 
as any big city anywhere. But many of the Irish live in smaller towns or on 
farms in rural areas. Visiting these places is very restful. People don’t feel 
the need to stick to a schedule . Things get done , but in a much more 
relaxed fashion. In my country ,there’s the feeling that you’re always late 
for something. In Ireland ,it feels like you’ve never late because no one stays 
on schedule. 
 Most of all, it would be interesting for me to meet the cousins in my 
mother’s family. They live in Donegal . I could see the house where my 
grandmother grew up and where my cousins still live. This house is 
connected to a lighthouse. Visiting there would give me a clearer idea of 
what my grandmother ‘s childhood was like. 
 Ireland would be a refreshing break from the life I lead in my own 
country. I wish I could go there. 
TOPIC 128 
In the future ,students may have the choice of studying at home by using 
technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional 
schools . Which would you prefer? Use reasons and specific details to 
explain your choice. 
 If I have a choice between studying at home using computers and 
television or studying in a traditional school setting, I’d choose the 
traditional setting . Maybe it’s just what I’m used to ,but I don’t think that 
technology can replace teachers and classrooms. 
 After all, technology can fail. Computers go down and computer programs 
crash. Televisions break, and the electricity can suddenly go off. In those 
situations, who's going to teach me? If I'm at school, and the television or the 
computers stop functioning, there's a teacher to step in and change the lesson 
plan. Teachers can draw on their teaching experience and be creative. 
Computers and televisions can't. 
 I'd also miss the chance to interact with other students if I weren't going to 
school. I think learning to play and work with other people is one of the 
most important lessons we learn in school. It prepares us for life, and for 
working with other people. Being with other people also helps us discover 
who we are. 
 Another concern I have about studying at home is getting distracted. It's 
strange, but I think being home alone is more distracting than being at 
school with a lot of people. At school, we're all focused on the same 
subjects. At home, it would be so easy to turn off the computer or the 
television and go do something else. I might tell myself that it's okay to play 
a computer game now and make up the study hours later. Chances are, I'd 
never make up the study hours. 
 I'm all in favor of using technology in the classroom. I think computers 
and television are great ways for students to have access to a lot of 
information. I just don't think they should be the only tools I have as a 
student. I also need teachers and other students to help me get a complete 
education. 
TOPIC 129 
When famous people such as actors, athletes, and rock stars give their 
opinions, many people listen. Do you think we should pay attention to 
these opinions? Use specific reasons and examples to support your 
answer. 
Everyone is entitled to have an opinion. When it comes to opinions, 
though there’s a difference between the majority of people and celebrities 
like actors, athletes and rocks stars . If you’ve an average person, only your 
family and friends care about your opinion. If your famous ,the whole world 
listens, or so it seems sometimes. Is this the way it should be ? I don’t think 
so. 
We shouldn’t pay attention to famous people’s opinions just because of 
who they are. Being a famous basketball player doesn’t make someone an 
expert on environmental issues. However, that basketball player has a better 
opportunity to be heard than most people do. If that player feels very 
strongly about an issue ,he can use his fame to draw attention to it and get 
other people involved. That way they can draw attention and needed dollars 
to that issue. 
People who are rich put their money behind a cause.. In the same way, 
famous people are using their most valuable asset. In their case, it’s not 
money, It’s their name recognition. Should people pay attention to what they 
think just because of who they are? I don’t think so. I also don’t think we 
should discount what they think just because of who there are. They have a 
right to their opinion. If their name draws people to that cause, all the better 
for the cause. 
I think too often we categorized people and try to keep them in their 
place. Celebrities have brains and should be allowed to use them. When they 
‘re advocating a cause, their opinion should be just one of money factors we 
use to evaluate that cause.. 
TOPIC 130 
The twentieth century saw great change. In your opinion, what is one 
change that should e remembered about the twentieth century? Use 
specific reasons and details to explain your choice. 
There have been many changes ,both technological and cultural, in the 
twentieth century. I believe that one stands out above the rest :advances in 
medical science. The changes in medical science go together with the 
changes in technological and cultural areas. One can move ahead only with 
the help of the others. We can see the results of medical advances in three 
areas: development of vaccines and antibiotics, expanded access to health 
care , and improved surgical techniques. 
When medical researchers learned how to prevent disease and stop it 
from spreading, the quality of life for many people around the world 
improved. Today smallpox is a forgotten disease and vaccinations are no 
longer required. Polio is under control and the vaccine is widely available . 
The development of penicillin has helped many people recover from serious 
illness. 
 Although health care is not universal even in developed countries, it is 
much better than it used to be. Local clinics, visiting nurses and specially 
hospitals have all improved the health care for our communities. 
 If you should be unfortunate and require surgery : you are still lucky to 
have the surgery today rather than even ten years ago. Now with 
microscopic and laser surgery, operations are more efficient. You spend less 
time in the hospital and you recover faster. 
 I can’t think of any other change that has affected the lives of so many 
people. Our health is important to all of us. We all are thankful for advances 
in the area of medical science. 
---------------------------