English teachers’ use of target language: a study in song cong primary schools
In the field of foreign language teaching, it has widely been believed that using target language
extensively has positive influences on the effectiveness of the teaching and learning. Nevertheless,
in some certain cases where the teachers demonstrate low proficiency, lack of confidence and do
not use English as routines, the teacher’s use of the target language has not become a regular
practice and the quality of this such use is still in dispute. This article has examined the current
situation of teachers’ use of target language in Binh Son 1, Binh Son 2 and Cai Dan primary
schools in Song Cong City, Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam. Moreover, the paper has pointed out
the teachers’ difficulties in maximizing the target language use. Questionnaire and observation are
used to collect data to explore the answers to research questions. Five teachers at Cai Dan, Binh
Son I and Binh Son II primary school are involved as participants in the study. Based on the
recommendations by American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL), the
research has further discussed specific strategies on enhancing the use of English instructions in
Vietnamese context.
it is more likely that they will increase the intake to transform what they have exposed in English class into their own repetoire. 4.2. Supporting comprehension and production through context/ gestures/ visual support Learners at all levels seem to acquire TL more effectively if the teachers’ instructions in TL are supported through context, gestures, visual objects, or connections with prior learning or experiences. It is particularly true with students at primary schools who prefer animation and are more engaged with visual things regardless of whether they are visual learners or not. The biggest benefit this strategy can offer is keeping and increasing students’ interest and motivation in learning. The feeling of comfort in a friendly language environment to a large extent can guarantee students’ comprehension in and production of the TL. 4.3. Focusing on meaning before details Before digging in to figure out details or nuances, primary students need support to get a general understanding of what is heard, read, or viewed, which will facilitate their success in classroom task performance. It is the instructors that provide students with a strong context, visuals, and a focused task such as finding out what is new information, or figuring out the main idea. Once students’ understanding of meaning is formed, they will feel more comfortable and motivated in learning; the effectiveness of English learning is better guarantted and thus the teacher’s use of TL will bring about benefits for both teachers and learners. 4.4. Conducting comprehension check to ensure understanding Students take many advantages from showing their understanding frequently. Frequent comprehension checks give students feelings that their efforts are valued and know what is necessary for them to improve upon. These comprehension checks also give teachers essential data to adjust their English instructions, whether they need to change Nguyen Thi Hong Minh et al TNU Journal of Science and Technology 199(06): 93 - 100 Email: jst@tnu.edu.vn 99 their instruction-giving techniques or develop better TL use to support students’ understanding. 4.5. Negotiating meaning with students and encouraging negotiations among students Learning takes place when learners are engaged and become essential part of the process. Teachers should help this happen by encouraging students’ participation in class negotiation. During an interpersonal activity to negotiate meaning and ideas, learners may need certain phrases to make their interactions more natural and teachers can provide these in the moment, adding key phrases to a physical or virtual “word wall” for learners to access during future language activities. 4.6. Eliciting talk that increases in fluency, accuracy, and complexity over time In order to raise primary students’ speaking skill, teachers should make simple questions such as tag questions or yes/no questions. The teachers also need to encourage students to interact with them by adding more details (who, when, what, etc.) since learners practice asking such questions, their speaking performance with increasing rate of fluency, accuracy and complexity will be improved over time. 4.7. Encouraging self-expression and spontaneous use of language It is crucial for students to realize from the beginning that they can respond in the TL, though simply at the word-level or with comprehensive gestures. This can be supported by teachers’ giving lots of choices using visuals and repetitive phrases that can be easily modified. As confidence builds, young learners should be encouraged to mix and match their language chunks to create their own messages. Students who apply their learned vocabulary and/or structures in new contexts are making their progress in English learning. 4.8. Teaching students strategies for requesting clarification and assistance when faced with comprehension difficulties To maintain target language use by both teachers and learners in English classes in primary schools, set phrases should be taught for students to ask for help or clarification in the target language (What? Huh? What do you mean by ___? How do you say ____? I don’t understand. Can you repeat that?). These learning aids, as well as other common classroom phrases, can be included on a “word wall” or printed on a list that can be given to the learners or even taped to desks. 4.9. Avoiding the mother tongue as the default for checking on meaning or understanding Another importance strategy is making careful instructional decisions about when NOT to use TL (keeping the minimum amount of classtime of what students say, hear, read, write, or view in the mother language). Teachers should maintain that for deeper processing of understanding in generally private exchanges between teacher and student, for reflection on the learning process or for explaining deeper understanding on an assessment. Native language use of Vietnamese is reserved for some certain situation and purposes, such as explaining why this approach is worthwhile and what learners should expect in this class (not knowing every word, but being able to guess at the meaning and show understanding in a variety of ways), to briefly explain a concept that would take too long to act out or demonstrate, or to allow for brief processing of an idea. The mother tongue should not be an easy default choice – otherwise, learners simply wait to hear words given in Vietnamese. This does not help build up students’ English yet decrease their efforts and strategies in communicating in the TL. From the revealed findings, it is seen that the teachers have been encountering some difficulties in using TL. The following recommendations are based on those difficulties. Nguyen Thi Hong Minh et al TNU Journal of Science and Technology 199(06): 93 - 100 Email: jst@tnu.edu.vn 100 4.10. Combine the use of CL with communication strategies All of the teachers admit that their students do not understand. Therefore, they should use more communication strategies such as body language, gestures, voice, or eye contact to provide more support for the students. Such communication strategies help students find it easier to understand the teachers’ instructions, be able to follow the instructions and perform given tasks successfully. 4.11. Improve their use of TL competence Not only should the teachers improve their general English competence, but they also develop their TL competence. They should attend workshops organized by Thai Nguyen DoET where they are not only equipped with current trends in English teaching methodologies but also can exchange their experience with other fellow teachers in the field. 4.12. Set an ideal English class that is suitable for primary students According to the MoET, there are no more than 35 students per classroom; however, many primary schools in Vietnam have been overloaded with students, which reduces the quality of teaching and learning. Therefore, the ideal English class should have such desired size to ensure that every student can practice and interact with the teachers and other students. In conclusion, improving teachers’ use of TL is very important. Using TL everyday develop teachers’ general English competence as well as TL competence and help their students get used to using English extensively in the class. It is obvious that teachers’ use of TL as authentic inputs for students facilitates the achievement of the ultimate goal in EFL learning. REFERENCES [1]. Cook, V., Using the First Language in the Classroom, Canadian Modern Language Review, 2001. [2]. Clarke, P., Supporting Children Learning English as a Second Language in the Early Years (birth to six years), Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority, 2009. [3]. Auerbach, E., Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom, TESOL Quarterly, 1993. [4]. Burden., The Use of the Students’ Mother Tongue in Monolingual English “Conversation” Classes at Japanese Universities, TLT Online Editor, 2000. [5]. Atkinson., Teaching monolingual classes, London: Longman, 1993. [6]. Buckmaster, R., First and second languages do battle for the classroom, The Guardian, 2000. [7]. Ellis, R., The Study of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford University, 2008. [8]. Krashen, Second language Acquisition and Second Language Learning, Pergamon Press, 1981. [9]. Larsen-Freeman, Input in second language acquisition, 1985. [10]. MacDonad, Using the target language. Cheltenam: Mary Glasgow Publications, 1993. [11]. Liu, J., L1 Use in L2 Vocabulary Learning: Facilitator or Barrier. International Education Studies, 2008. [12]. Turnbull, There is a role for the L1 in second and foreign language teaching. Cadanian Morden Language Review, 2001. [13]. ACTFL, Use of the target language in the classroom, 2010. [14]. Orland-Barak & Yinon, Different but similar: Student teachers' perspectives on the use of L1 in Arab and Jewish EFL classroom settings, Language, Culture and Curriculum, 2005. [15]. Macaro, E., Analyzing Student Teachers' Codeswitching in Foreign Language classroom: Theories and Decision Making. The Modern Language Journal, 2001. [16]. Pinter, Teaching young language learners. Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2006. [17]. Richards, J. C., Competence and performance in language teaching. RELC Journal, 2010. [18]. Le, Van Canh & Willy Renandya, Teacher's English Proficiency and Classroom language Use. RELC Journal. [19]. Tennant, A. and Nigussie Negash, Language Improvement for English teachers. British Council, 2009.
File đính kèm:
- 1061_2292_1_pb_516_2143979.pdf