An investigation into the factors that hinder the participation of the second-Year english-major students in english speaking lessons at thuong mai university
This research is implemented to investigate the factors that hinder students’ participation in
speaking activities at Thuong Mai University. The research’s objects are the teachers and the
second-year English-major students of English from Thuong Mai University. To attain the aim
of the research, the questionnaires and interview were used as instruments to take data from 10
lecturers and 175 students. The revealed factors included affective-related problems, socially
related problems, instructor- related problems, educational system and facility-related problem
and linguistic-related problems. Of which, linguistic-related problems have the most effective
factor on students’ participation in speaking activities while instructor–related problems have the
smallest impact on students’ participation in speaking activities. In addition, some suggestions are
made with the hope for better methods to help the teachers reduce their students’ negative effect
of these factors during the process of learning speaking English.
and read. 90% the EFL students reported the linguistic factor as their most-impeding psychological problem in speaking classes. It seems that the EFL students were aware of their poor pronunciation and the EFL instructors also believed their EFL students did not possess a good command of English pronunciation. The instructors might not thus need to raise their EFL students’ awareness of their pronunciation problems any more. Moreover, the EFL instructors believed that their EFL students thought in Vietnamese when they spoke in English, a problem which becomes readily evident if one teaches English as a foreign language in Vietnam, even for just a short period, due to mother tongue interference. 6. RECOMMENDATION 6.1. Helping students to improve their knowledge of grammar and enrich their vocabulary The research findings point out that the majority of the students found it hard to carry out their speaking tasks because of their poor vocabulary, ideas and knowledge relating to the speaking topics. Thus, the teachers should find out the speaking topics which suit for students’ language level. With such a topic, it is quite easy for students to speak and express their opinions. Moreover, teachers have to create a competitive atmosphere for the students to use new words and structures in speaking activities. Last but not least, teachers must find other materials relevant to students’ interest, provide students with vocabulary, structures and information students need. 6.2. Managing speaking turns suitably Some students in class are often hesitant or anxious about speaking the target language and some others usually tend to dominate classroom activities. These differences are caused by personality traits. Teachers, therefore, should balance students’ speaking turns. To balance students’ speaking turns, at first, we give simple and clear instructions so that students understand what they are supposed to do. Secondly, teachers should be patient when listening to students’ speaking. They also need to give students opportunities and time to practice and raise their voices freely. Students are encouraged to ask questions, give suggestions, share ideas, and tell stories. Teachers, furthermore, should ask students to prepare speaking tasks at home carefully. By this way, teachers will help the anxious students have more time to prepare vocabulary, structures relating to the speaking topics and make them more confident in their own ability. 6.3. Helping students to be confident The findings of the study show that students felt reluctant to speak due to lack of confident. Most of them felt shy to speak English in class. The teachers, therefore, should try to understand their shyness to help them have more confidence when practising English in front of the class. Firstly, to reduce students’ anxieties teachers must create an atmosphere in which they feel comfortable 96 KHOA HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ QUÂN SỰNo. 19 (5/2019) v DISCUSSION “thinking out-loud,” taking intellectual risks, asking questions, and admit when students do not know anything. Moreover, teachers should point out students’ speaking ability, give encouragement so that they will have no fear to speak. They, also, let students choose topics and partner to discuss. This would result in comfortable discussion and it is easier for students to express their own opinions confidently. 6.4. Being enthusiastic, friendly, helpful and tolerant Teachers’ characteristics are decisive factors to increase students’ participation. Teachers’ enthusiasm, friendliness, helpfulness and tolerance will create students’ interest in speaking English. So, teachers must pay attention to the shy and nervous students. The friendly, sympathetic attitude of a teacher to a class brings out the best effect on both teaching and learning. In the classroom, the teacher is the source of information, the adviser or sometimes the friend of the students. Next, teachers had better have a tolerant attitude towards students’ errors. In other words, we need to consider mistakes as part of the natural process of language learning so it is not necessary to correct every single mistake. Through the results of questionnaires and interviews, most students did not want to speak because of making mistakes. The teachers, therefore, have to be friendly, give a smile instead of getting angry when students make mistakes. 6.5. Forming a habit of speaking English in the class In order to increase the students’ time of speaking English in the class, the teachers should form a habit of using English. This habit should be built from the beginning of the first lesson. Teachers need to use English all the time but the English used should not be too complicated so that the students can understand what the teachers say. Besides, let the students have more chance to practice listening to get acquainted to native speakers’ voice. Once the students have developed a habit of speaking English in class, they will participate more often in classroom speaking activities. Moreover, it is suggested that the university should have clear purposes and objectives in its English training program by providing a systematic curriculum in which the training content and testing content must be in accordance to serve the common purposes and objectives. The pedagogical focus on accuracy rather than fluency is also a contributive to limited use of English in EFL classrooms. Therefore, students tend to spend more time practicing three other skills to be well- prepared for their tests rather than speaking. 7. CONCLUSION Students’ participation plays an important role in speaking activities. If we want to have a successful speaking lesson, teachers should pay more attention to the factors that hinder students’ participation such as students’ personality, students’ anxiety or students’ language level and try to improve our teaching methods, our characteristics as well as our roles. The researcher hopes that this study will make an especial significant contribution to better the current teaching and learning to speak English at university today./. References: Aljamal, D., & Aljamal, G. (2014). An investigation of the difficulties faced by EFL undergraduates in speaking skills. English Language Teaching, 7(1), 84–89. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Griffin, R. (2005). L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 33, 401–415. Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Byrne, D. (1976). Teaching Oral Speaking. London: Longman Group. UK. Limited. Byrne, D. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Byrne, D. (1995). Teaching Oral Speaking. London: Longman Group. UK. Limited. 97KHOA HỌC NGOẠI NGỮ QUÂN SỰNo. 19 (5/2019) DISCUSSION v NGHIÊN CỨU CÁC YẾU TỐ HẠN CHẾ SỰ THAM GIA NÓI CỦA SINH VIÊN NĂM THỨ 2 KHOA TIẾNG ANH TRONG GIỜ HỌC NÓI TIẾNG ANH TẠI TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC THƯƠNG MẠI TRẦN LAN HƯƠNG Tóm tắt: Nghiên cứu này được thực hiện để điều tra các yếu tố cản trở sự tham gia của sinh viên năm thứ 2 chuyên ngành tiếng Anh vào các hoạt động nói tại Đại học Thương Mại. Để đạt được mục đích nghiên cứu, các bảng câu hỏi và phỏng vấn được sử dụng làm công cụ để lấy dữ liệu từ 10 giảng viên và 175 sinh viên. Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng bao gồm các vấn đề liên quan đến tâm lí, xã hội, giảng viên, hệ thống giáo dục, cơ sở vật chất và các vấn đề liên quan đến ngôn ngữ. Kết quả nghiên cứu đã chỉ ra mức độ ảnh hưởng của các yếu tố này tới việc tham gia nói của sinh viên trong lớp học, trong đó các vấn đề liên quan đến hiểu biết về ngôn ngữ có ảnh hưởng tiêu cực lớn nhất đối với sinh viên, trong khi các vấn đề liên quan đến giảng viên chỉ gây ra cản trở không đáng kể đến sự tham gia của sinh viên vào các hoạt động nói. Từ khoá: cản trở, kỹ năng nói, nhân tố ảnh hưởng, tiếng Anh Ngày nhận bài: 15/11/2018; ngày sửa chữa: 10/4/2019; ngày duyệt đăng: 28/4/2019 Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J. (2002). ESL learners’ perceptions of their pronunciation needs and strategies. System, 30(2), 155–166. Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gregersen, T., & Horwitz, E. (2009). Language learning and perfectionism: Anxious and non-anxious language learners’ reactions to their own oral performance. The Modern Language Journal, 86(5), 562–570. Liu, M. (2005). Reticent in oral English classroom: A case study in China. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 1–16. Liu, M. (2006). Anxiety in Chinese EFL students at different proficiency level. System, 34, 301–316. Nunan, D. (2003). Language Teaching Methodology: A text book for teachers. New York: Prentice Hall. Senel, M. (2012). Oral communication anxiety and problems of Turkish EFL learners at Samsun 19 Mayis University, ELT department. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 3, 49–58. Stephen, W., Doughty, P., Gray, p. J., Hopcroft, J. E., & Silvera, I. F. (2006). Observations on Undergraduate Education in Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, and Physics at Select Universities in Vietnam. Washington: Vietnam Education Foundation. Stevens, B. (2005). What communication skills do employers want? Silicon Valley recruiters respond. Journal of Employment Counseling, 42(1), 2-9. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in Its Development. In S. Grass and C.Madden (eds.) 1982, Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Tran Ngoc Ca (2006). Universities as drivers of the urban economies in Asia: The case of Vietnam. Policy Research Working Paper: World Bank. Ur, P. (1996), A Course in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
File đính kèm:
- khnnqs_19_5_2019_86_97_tran_lan_huong_5483_2141854.pdf