A study on high school students’ perceptions of the process of learning to write emails in English
The present study was carried out to investigate students’ perceptions of the process of learning to write emails in English. The participants comprised of 100 high school students of grade 11. Data collection methods include questionnaire, interview and reflective journals. The study found that students had good awareness of email writing skills in the classroom. They shared their viewpoints on the process of learning to write emails in English both negatively and positively, with positive opinions outweighing negative ones. The findings also revealed that the respondents had positive attitudes toward email writing skills and tended to accept their difficulties as motivation in their language classes. Based on the findings of the study, implications were put forward as to how to teach and learn to write emails in English effectively
Journal of Science, Hue University of Education ISSN 1859-1612, No. 02(50)/2019: pp. 25-38 Received: 30/9/2018; Revised: 05/10/2018; Accepted: 18/10/2018 A STUDY ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE PROCESS OF LEARNING TO WRITE EMAILS IN ENGLISH TRAN THI TO, LE PHAM HOAI HUONG Univeristy of Foreign Languages, Hue University Abstract: The present study was carried out to investigate students’ perceptions of the process of learning to write emails in English. The participants comprised of 100 high school students of grade 11. Data collection methods include questionnaire, interview and reflective journals. The study found that students had good awareness of email writing skills in the classroom. They shared their viewpoints on the process of learning to write emails in English both negatively and positively, with positive opinions outweighing negative ones. The findings also revealed that the respondents had positive attitudes toward email writing skills and tended to accept their difficulties as motivation in their language classes. Based on the findings of the study, implications were put forward as to how to teach and learn to write emails in English effectively. Keywords: Email writing process, reflections 1. INTRODUCTION The important roles of email in improving EFL learners’ language proficiency and supporting human beings in daily work have been studied by many researchers. Findings from studies on email learning and teaching have showed that email has been so far the most popular and useful tool for foreign language education (Chaffee-Sorace, 1999). Thus, studying students’ perceptions of the process of learning to write emails in English is necessary for both teachers and learners in increasing the instructional quality. The importance of emails in teaching and learning Nowadays technology, especially email is developing rapidly all over the world. As a result, the use of email is increasing in the classrooms for the purpose of promoting language learning and teaching. It can be seen that email writing is one of the most important skills that students should master in order to support them not only for learning but also for real-life situations, especially when they are preparing for university study. The rapid increase in the use of web tools in language teaching and learning has promoted email as a common interpersonal communication medium. As its high transmission speed, email has been widely used for both personal communication and institutional communication, particularly in academic and business institutions (Crystal, 2001). Schwienkorst (1998) and Warschaur (1995) indicated that email writing provides a context for real-world communication and authentic interaction by connecting foreign language speakers outside the classroom with other speakers in communicative 26 TRAN THI TO, LE PHAM HOAI HUONG situations. In the context of the classroom, email provides immediate feedback and allows students to discuss and communicate directly and cheaply with key pals around the world (Hoffman, 1994). Email is also a useful tool for students to improve their English writing skills. According to Alias and Hussin (2002), web- based activities such as searching for information, exchanging of messages via email and participating in discussion groups are helpful to learners in their writing process. Accordingly, the students can enrich their knowledge about the world and foster their writing ideas. What’s more, speed, power, and flexibility of the computer and email can effectively facilitate their second language acquisition, and then help students raise their awareness of learning writing. More importantly, developing email writing skill is especially necessary for English language students at the secondary stage. In terms of developing the overall ability of writing for high school students, they have to learn how to write emails in English. It can be said that the secondary level of education is a stage of consolidation, supporting and reinforcing English language basics previously learnt by students during the preparatory stage (Abdel-Razek, 2006). By using emails, they also become familiar with a communication tool that is vital to their survival in the 21st century. Thus, mastering writing skills during the high school study helps students’ progress in their university studies (El-Shafie, 2006). Students’ reflections on the process of email writing Reflection is a term which has been much used in the educational literature over the past decade (Boud, Keogh, & Walker, 1985). Among many various definitions about reflection, Boud et al. (1985) shared the definitions with some common features and these are worth considering in more detail. Reflective thought was defined as active, persistent and careful consideration of any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the grounds that support it and the further evidence by which the reliability and worth of a belief can be established so as to justify its acceptance. It is clear that an important outcome of the reflection process is changing one’s perspective as new information and experiences are encountered (Hay et al., 2004a). The reflection processes not only involve in the self but the outcomes of reflection also lead into a changed conceptual perspective, which helps learners understand the relationship between their learning and problem-solving goals. In the light of developing one’s knowledge and skills, reflection can be considered as a learning tool and action process has long been seen as a crucial prerequisite to effective decision making, especially in decision environments that contain ambiguous problems, unique elements, and no defined solutions (Pee et al., 2000; Schon, 1987). Therefore, it supports to revise extant understanding or to construct new meaning when experience incorporates a variety of mental and emotional processes such as dealing with fuzzy ideas to reconcile ambiguity and inconsistency; to recognize that one’s current knowledge set may be confused, incomplete or misconceived; culminating in the purposeful realignment of meaning to that which is different (Maclellan, 2004). A STUDY ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE PROCESS... 27 When making a discussion about reflection in teaching and learning process, McAlpine et al (1991) stated that reflection can also occur prior to, concurrent with, and retrospective to instruction. Besides, teaching and reflection can also be a continuous and synchronous process in which they occur concurrently (Schon, 1987). However, this researcher also indicated that reflection may also occur asynchronously at some point when finishing the classes, and thus be disconnected from teaching actions. According to him, the retrospective reflection-on-action represents the most common conception of reflection. In other aspects, it also provides the opportunity for dramatic, extensive structural changes, and is more likely to take place in the strategic or epistemic sphere. Previous studies So far, there have been researches related to the fields of email writing in teaching in language education. For example, Liu (2011) conducted a research on EFL students’ perceptions of power differentials and their negotiation strategies when communicating with native English-speaking students via emails. The main participants, twenty eight Taiwanese and American undergraduates, participated in a semester-long cross-national email writing activity. The research showed that students in both places recognized power differentials. Especially, focusing on the Taiwanese students, the study identified their textual identities and writing styles used to negotiate power differentials in three types of interactions – balance, endurance, and resistance. Obviously, this study tried to provide insights into how important emails are applied to communicate with native English-speaking students. The findings offer important implications for teaching English writing in cross-national digital spaces. Mansor (2007) concentrated on collaborative learning via email discussion. Throughout exploring the strategies of implementing email in ESL writing classroom, the study focuses on how emails can be implemented in a collaborative learning ambience incorporating the stages of writing process approach and pair work activity. In order to obtain the success of the approach, both teachers and learners share their responsibilities together. Besides, the study was carried out with the hope that collaborative learning environment via email discussions has a positive effect on the students’ writing performance particularly in ESL writing classrooms. Another study was carried out by Mahfouz (2010) at a Jordanian university. The researcher tried to explore email exchanges with native speakers and how they can be used as a useful tool to improve the students’ foreign language proficiency in general and writing skill in particular. The research collected data from 110 university students in the Faculty of Educational Sciences and Arts at UNRWA University in Amman, Jordan through a set of questionnaire. The results showed that students' perceptions of using email interactions with native English speakers for improving their writing skills were generally positive. Besides, the study also pointed out three main differences among participants that related to whether they have a computer at home, how many years they can study at university and how often they can exchange emails with native English key pals so as to improve their writing skills. 28 TRAN THI TO, LE PHAM HOAI HUONG The fact was that email writing is important for both teachers and learners; however, few studies have been carried out to investigate the student’s reflections on the process of learning to write emails in English to see that the students’ viewpoints can better the email writing skills for learners and improve teaching quality. The current study was set out to fill this gap. 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY The purpose of study is to investigate the students’ perceptions of learning email writing in English, how they write emails in English in writing periods. Hence, the study focused on gathering data from high school students only. In order that the data reliability is strengthened to provide a clearer understanding of the problem, research triangulation with three data collection instruments including questionnaire, interview, and reflective journals was employed in this study. The study called for the voluntary participation of 100 students of grade 11 at a high school in Quang Tri province. All of them began learning English at the age of 8-11. Bell (1993, p.76) argues that questionnaire is very useful tool for gathering a wide range of data cheaply and quickly. Therefore, using questionnaire is so useful because of its convenience. The questionnaire was designed and sent to 100 students of grade 11 students. It consisted of 35 statements basing on a five-point scale. The questionnaire involving in the content of how students learn to write emails in English includes four main clusters. Cluster 1 focused on teacher’s effort in encouraging students to learn email writing in English. Clusters 2 dealt with teacher’s methods in instructing students how to write emails. Students’ ways of learning to write emails in English was discussed in Cluster 3 and then Cluster 4 focused on teacher’s feedback for students’ email writings. The current study also interviewed 10 students of grade 11 in order to gather a variety of information about how they learn to write emails in English, their attitudes and reactions toward their email learning in English classes. There are five questions in the interview. The questions asked the interviewees about how they learn to write emails in English, how the teacher guided them to write emails, whether they got help from classmates and teachers. In addition, the students’ reflections on that learning process and some difficulties they had to face in email writing lessons were also mentioned in the interview. Besides, twenty students were invited to write reflective journals to reflect on the process of learning to write emails as well. It is believed that the focus on learning from reflective processes has the potential to enhance and illuminate the realities of the context in which practice takes place, and to help the students and practitioners to describe and understand their feelings and influence in the situation. Also, there is the potential, through critical reflection and action, for the students and practitioners to challenge the 'existing order' through an understanding of the factors which are influenced beyond and outside their immediate situations (Foster and Greenwood, 1998). Therefore, reflective journal writing is recognized as not only a valuable tool to promote students' learning but also an A STUDY ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE PROCESS... 29 educational strategy for facilitating learning in the practice setting. In this study, the reflective journal was designed by the researcher. The students reflected on the practice of learning to write emails in English, how they learnt emails at school, how they felt about the effectiveness of the email writing lessons, some difficulties they face with. Six questions were designed to support students whether they know what should be included in their writing. In addition, the reflective journals aim to collect information about what the students really think about email writing lessons at school. Hence, they are required to write the journals after finishing the email writing periods. Moreover, students were required to write journals in Vietnamese at home. Then, twenty reflective journals were collected for data analysis. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Before presenting numerical facts, Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient was used to test the reliability of the questionnaires. It reached 0.790 indicating acceptable reliability of the questionnaire. The mean scores of four clusters were presented in the following table: Table 1. Mean scores of four clusters N Minimum Maximum Mean SD Cluster 1 100 2.00 5.00 3.59 0.61 Cluster 2 100 2.57 5.00 3.79 0.54 Cluster 3 100 2.00 5.00 3.71 0.51 Cluster 4 100 1.75 5.00 3.24 0.65 As shown in Table 1, the mean score of the all clusters with 100 participants was rather high (M>3). In addition, the standard deviation for most clusters was at acceptable level. These statistics show that the current study employed a reliable tool for data collection. The study continued examining the statistics of how students learn to write emails in English. The following table presents the statistics of teacher’s effort in encouraging students to learn email writing. Table 2. Teacher’s effort in encouraging students to learn email writing in English Number = 100 Min Max Mean SD 1.The teacher often discuss directly with us the importance of emails writing in the class activities. 1 5 3.38 0.98 2.The teacher starts the lesson with interesting pre-email writing activities to stimulate our participation 1 5 3.54 1.04 3.The teacher provides some supplementary information or appropriate strategies for us to write emails. 1 5 3.69 0.91 6.The teacher often brings hunour into the classroom 1 5 3.94 1.04 22.The teacher often take time to celebrate students’ success in email writing lesson. 1 5 3.40 1.01 30 TRAN THI TO, LE PHAM HOAI HUONG Among the above items for teacher’s effort in encouraging students to learn email writing in English, the mean of teacher’s humor in the classroom reached 3.94; this was also the highest score whereas the lowest value for item 1 stands at 3.38. To the items 2, 22 and 3, the mean scores were 3.54, 3.40 and 3.69 respectively, significantly higher than the average. However, the statement 3 achieves the lowest SD, at 0.91, showing the response rate to be closer to the mean value. Whereas, the item 2 reaches the highest SD indicating that the response rate was quite spreading out. Clearly, the teacher’s humor got the highest mean in the study. Moreover, when being invited to answer the interview, one male student expressed that he expected to learn in a funny atmosphere in the classroom and he felt satisfied with his lesson. He said: “I supposed that email writing activities toward our learning were really important. I did not want to be under high pressure during email writing; however; I felt lucky when studying with my English teacher, Mrs. Huyen, who always tried to bring us many funny stories, interesting activities in our lessons”. Another student shared her viewpoints about the process of email writing in reflective journals. She wrote: “Our teacher helped me to recognize that email writing not only supported us to send, receive the data quickly and shared information easily but also contributed to improve our writing skills”. Tallon (2008) also indicated that teachers should usually encourage students that their language proficiency certainly gets better if they try to learn. It was the teacher who could motivate their students why email writing played an important role in writing skill and engage them in learning email writing through interesting activities. The students, hence, have more belief in themselves and try to reach higher achievement in language proficiency. In the reflective journal, a female student shared: “For me, learning to write a good email in English is difficult; however; emails supported me to manipulate with the modern technology easily and I did not become out of date. Thanks to our teacher’s explanation and the exchange of learning experiences every day, I have improved my email writing skill so as to support my study and my work in the future”. The current study implies that the students really expect the funny, comfortable learning environment in email writing lessons; hence, both teacher and students should pay more attention to how to create interesting activities to make the lesson more effective. Furthermore, the teacher should also try to begin the email writing lessons with many exciting writing activities, help students understand the necessity of learning email writing, and provide supplementary information or appropriate strategies toward the students’ email writing learning. The Table 3 displays the data for teacher’s methods in instructing students how to write emails in English. As shown in Table 3, the mean score of the grammar supplies achieved the highest value, M= 4.04 showing that grammar is the most important factor that students would like to master. Regarding new/more words (item 8, M= 3.96) and the explanation how to write email from English teachers (item 15, M = 3.95), the study revealed that the A STUDY ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE PROCESS... 31 majority of students considered these values as integral as grammar. The mean value of item 10 ranks fourth, followed by items 7 (M= 3.68) and item 4 (M= 3.69) respectively. Item 4 has the lowest mean score, at 3.45. The standard deviation for most items was rather similar, excepting from items 4 and 5. These values show reliability in responses given by the respondents for teacher’s methods in instructing students how to write emails in English. Table 3. Teacher’s methods in instructing students how to write emails in English N= 100 Min Max Mean SD 4.The teacher often requires us to participate in pair and group work activities
File đính kèm:
- a_study_on_high_school_students_perceptions_of_the_process_o.pdf