963 bài Essays mẫu - Phần 33

to put forward is that to escape stress we 
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at 
www.tailieuduhoc.org 
should plan ahead. To illustrate this point, there is an example more persuasive: if we 
have to take extra responsibilities, we should be careful that these do not overload to us. 
Furthermore, we should always include extra time in our plans to deal with emergencies 
and unexpected development. For instance, if we have to drive someone to the airport, we 
should arrive a few minutes early and could avoid some delay happen on the road. In the 
second place, another chief reason for my view is that we should have realistic 
expectations. For instance, no matter how tempting it may be, we should not allow people 
to think that we are supermen or superwomen who can handle any or every demand at a 
moment's notice. We should see stressful situations coming, and avoid them in advance 
by only agreeing to do what we can accomplish easily within the time we have available. 
Finally, we should maintain a sense of humor. For instance, we should be able to laugh 
when our plan go wrong, since laughter is an antidote to stress. Moreover, we should 
laugh at our problems in front of others, to relieve tension and encourage them. To sum 
up, given the reasons discussed above, to escape stress we should plan ahead, and always 
have time for unexpected. Moreover, w should have realistic expectations, and not try to 
solve every problem for others. Finally, we should maintain a sense of humor and laugh 
when we face some problems. I believe that these are the three best ways to reduce stress. 
Essay 502 Topic 97 Should teacher be paid according to how much their students 
learn? 
Teaching quality is the key element to influence learners` achievements. Being a teacher 
myself, I am not completely satisfied with the teachers` performance in my country. 
Thus, I find the idea of financial interdependence between teaching quality and students` 
academic results appealing. I believe, I can solve such common problems as wasted time 
or boring lessons. 
Teaching is a paid job, therefore, if some money incentives were introduced, it would 
encourage teachers to seek for the most effective way to present and get across the 
material. For example, it could make us more interested in new teaching methods. We 
would attend special workshops more often and do our best to implement the techniques 
we previously shied away from. 
If some objective tests of students ` achievements were introduced, teachers would be 
more interested in getting involved all the class. Which could help to solve the problem 
of teachers focusing their attention on the strong students only, while neglecting less 
advanced ones. 
Making the learners achievement the crucial element for estimating the quality of the 
lesson would encourage the teachers be more efficient with their time. It could eliminate 
the common problem of wasted time and personal stories. Shifting the emphasis from 
?optimistic environment in class ?to academic achievements would be more beneficial to 
the students in the long run. 
I believe, that financial incentives are able to improve teachers performance in class, 
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at 
www.tailieuduhoc.org 
make us more interested in using some innovative techniques, be more productive with 
the time and focused on all the students. That is why I favor the idea of changing the pay 
system for teachers and make it more competitive. 
Essay 503 Topic 97 Should teacher be paid according to how much their students 
learn? 
I think it unreasonable that teachers are paid according to how much their students learn. 
In fact, teachers should be paid according to how much effort they pay. How much 
students learn cannot exactly judge how much effort teachers pay. So teachers should not 
be paid according to how much students learn. 
Teaching and studying complement each other. If a teacher does not teach his students 
anything, the students will learn nothing. While if one student does not study carefully, 
no matter how much his teacher teaches him, he will learn few. If the teacher is paid 
according to how much that student learn, the teacher will be paid few. It is unfair! 
Therefore teachers should not be paid according to how much students learn. 
We suppose that teachers had been paid according to how much students learn, how can 
we exactly judge how much students learn? According to their grades, some students` 
grades may be A+`s, while some others` grades are perhaps D`s. We will be according to 
which grade to judge how much their teacher will be paid? Moreover, some examinations 
are easy and some are difficult. The degree of difficulty may affect students` grades 
directly. Thus it is not comprehensive to judge how much students learn through 
examinations or any other way. So it is unreasonable to pay teachers according to how 
much students learn. Finally, if teachers are paid according to how much stuents learn, 
teachers will try to teach students excessive knowledge in order that they can be paid 
more money, thus the schoolwork would be too heavy to be control by students. Owing 
to pressure, students maybe lose their interest in study. In order to avoid that, teachers 
should not be paid according to how much their students learn. All in all, the means to 
pay teachers according to how much their students learn is in order to make teachers 
more responsible to their students. I admit that it is the positive effect. However, the three 
negative aspects I have mentioned cannot be ignored. In a word, the disadvantages 
outweigh the advantages. So teachers should not be paid according to how much their 
students learn. 
Essay 504 Topic 97 Response to Topic 97 
Although many people are paid according to how good they are doing in their profession, 
I think that teachers can only be partly rewarded for their students grades and knowledge. 
Getting paid only for the performance of the students in tests and quantity of their 
knowledge will lead to an excessive drill in classrooms, where teachers like and support 
only hard working, intelligent people because they are the cause for his good salary, 
For more material and information, please visit Tai Lieu Du Hoc at 
www.tailieuduhoc.org 
while people who have natural difficulties in learning things won't be good for teachers 
and popular among them at all. First of all I think that everyone should be paid according 
to his performance in work, that is why I would agree with the statement if the only thing 
teachers had to do is getting their pupils to learn. But teachers should also show and teach 
things to their students that are not approvable in normal knowledge tests, like social 
skills, tolerance and an open mind. That is why I believe that paying teachers only based 
on how much their students know would lead to a one dimensional style of classes in 
general, there would be many facts, dates and formulas to learn for students but some 
other important things would be left aside, just because the teacher would get no reward 
for teaching them. In contrast to that, a system where teachers are not at all paid for their 
performance is in my opinion not the best way to reward work either. If paid for how 
much his students know, the teacher will prepare well for his classes, he will inform 
himself about good didactic ways of showing things and his knowledge will be up to 
date. These are obvious advantages of the suggested system. The main drawback of the 
statement is that teachers would push and foster their students only in one direction and 
they would not care about their social and emotional situation. Support in other matters 
than learning would become rare, slower students could become a burden to teachers 
because they would lower their salary. Teachers will love their good students while the 
bad ones would bother them. This could even lead to teachers mobbing their bad students 
out of the class or similar actions. For this reason I think that this system would create 
more harm than good. Maybe a mixed system of generating a teachers salary would be 
good, like for instance apart from looking only on the performance of students also 
making polls about how satisfied and happy they are with the class given to them. A good 
teacher will have students who know a lot and also like him, therefore he should be paid 
well. Teachers who don't prepare for classes will have ignorant students and their pupils 
probably won't like them much either. A system like this could improve the situation at 
schools and universities and it would probably make teaching a more attractive 
profession for performance oriented people who until now where driven back by low 
salaries and lazy teacher-colleagues. Therefore, a change in the payment system for 
teachers is necessary but it should not be a burden on students, like the suggested one 
would in my opinion be. 
Essay 505 Topic 98 What would you choose to represent your country at an 
international exhibition? 
If I was asked to send one thing representing our country to an international exhibition I 
will choose an object that must to be distinctive, full of Chinese culture and loved by our 
national people. Therefore, a piece of cheongsam would be a perfect choice. 
First, the cheongsam contributes women beauty. Cheongsam is a kind of female dress 
with distinctive Chinese feature. It fits well the female Chinese stature. Its neck is high, 
collar is closed and sleeves may be either short or long. Unlike other normal dresses the 
cheongsam is buttoned on the right side with a loose chest, a fitting waist. All of these 
were combined to set off the beauty of the female shape. It creates an impression of 
charm, elegance and neatness.